Archive for the ‘green’ Category

I was recently asked about building a power efficient server, and it seemed like a good idea to share my advice with a wider audience.

Anyone who has to deal with a hosting facility very likely knows the crunch that they’re running into with power. A standard rack may only have 42 rack units in it, but you’ll be lucky to be able to fit and power 15 servers in that rack, on a standard 30 amp circuit. If you’re careful in planning, I can help you get squeeze a bit more into that rack. I won’t advocate any particular server vendor, but I do believe that you’ll have more flexibility with a custom white-box builder, instead of going with one of the (often pricier) big name vendors.

Overall, you want to lower your power draw per server. With some careful planning, you can lower your power consumption by a fair bit, and still get the same power per machine. Here are a few things to consider:

Click to continue reading “How to make your rack mount servers more power efficient”

Just to give a real-world example of how I use my kill-a-watt P4400:

The 10+ year old 3com 10/100 network switch I used at home was getting noisy, and I realized that it was probably not a bad time to upgrade it.   Power wasn’t specifically on my mind when I went to do the upgrade, though it did occur to me mid-process when I noted that many of the home network switches were very low on power draw. I’ve ended up replacing  10ish year old 3com 24 port 10/100 switch that was built for enterprise use with a 5 port 10/100/1000 switch that was built for home use.   How this has played out power-wise with measurements from my kill-a-watt:

Switch power draw cost to me yearly cost to run
3Com 45 watts free $70.92
Trendnet 4 watts $19.99 $6.30

Now, 41 watts may not seem like much of a difference, but it can add up to real money.   When all is said and done, I pay about 18 cents a kilowatt-hour, including, generation, transmission, and all the assorted fees that go with it.

The basic math breaks down like this:
45 watts (3com) - 4 watts (Trendnet) = a power savings of 41 watts.

41 (watts) * 24 (hours in a day) = 984 watt-hours

984 (watt-hours) * 365 (days in a year) = 359160 watt-hours per year or 359 kilowatt-hours per year.

359 kilowatt-hours * .18 cents per kilowatt-hour = $64.62/year

or, to refer to the above chart: $70.92 - $6.30 = $64.62/year.

So, by investing $19.99 in a newer, better, quieter, switch, I’ll be saving $64.62 a year.   I find myself doing these sorts of calculations on many things around the house.    I’m a big fan of old and reliable, but there is a place for new and cost-effective too.     I’m in middle of a slow and gradual process of replacing all of my old CRT monitors (which can often draw 100-150 watts) with newer, smaller LCD monitors ( the 19″ LCD on my desk draws 30 watts).   If you run the calculations above, you can see that it can add up to real money fairly quickly.  To be fair, monitors are a little trickier, since they may not be on all the time.   My network switch is though, so $64.62 is real savings to me, and the switch itself will be paid off fairly quickly.

15
Oct

Kill-a-watt

   Posted by: sgw Tags: , ,

P3 International P4400 Kill A WATT Electricity Load Meter and Monitor

Power prices have been rising, and in an effort to both become more green, and to keep cost under control, I went looking for a solution that would help me measure my electrical power usage. Enter the kill-a-watt.

I got my kill-a-watt years ago, off Ebay.   This was back before power prices really went through the roof.  Buying this changed how I viewed almost every electrical device in my house.    Knowing how much something draws, what the “phantom draw” is, and how much power it draws over time is a big win.   It was an easy way to figure out that my 10+ year old air conditioner was no where near the efficiency of my newer unit.

The kill-a-watt causes something of an obsession in many people.   Once you have one, you find yourself running around and monitoring everything, and just seeing how much different things draw.    On the whole, I’ve found this to be useful in that even having the general awareness of the power draw and my electricity bill has caused me to be more active in keeping things turned off.  I only wish that it had a serial port.

The kill-a-watt will measure amps, watts, volts, and and kilowatt-hours per hour.

I think this tool is worth the money.   It’s simple, easy to use, and it gives good, valuable information.   It’s also something that raises awareness, and if you’re a geek like me, it will help you lower your electricity bill.